Comparison of weak lensing by NFW and Einasto halos and systematic errors
arXiv:1504.05183 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/042
Abstract
Recent N-body simulations have shown that Einasto radial profiles provide the most accurate description of dark matter halos. Predictions based on the traditional NFW functional form may fail to describe the structural properties of cosmic objects at the percent level required by precision cosmology. We computed the systematic errors expected for weak lensing analyses of clusters of galaxies if one wrongly models the lens density profile. Even though the NFW fits of observed tangential shear profiles can be excellent, viral masses and concentrations of very massive halos (>~ 10^{15}M_Sun/h) can be over- and underestimated by ~10 per cent, respectively. Misfitting effects also steepen the observed mass-concentration relation, as observed in multi-wavelength observations of galaxy groups and clusters. Based on shear analyses, Einasto and NFW halos can be set apart either with deep observations of exceptionally massive structures (>~ 2\times10^{15}M_Sun/h) or by stacking the shear profiles of thousands of group-sized lenses (>~ 10^{14}M_Sun/h).
12 pages, 4 figures, in press on JCAP; v02: cosmic noise included
References in corpus (14)
- The redshift dependence of the structure of massive LCDM halos
- CLASH: Weak-Lensing Shear-and-Magnification Analysis of 20 Galaxy Clusters
- The Observed Concentration-Mass Relation for Galaxy Clusters
- The MUSIC of CLASH: predictions on the concentration-mass relation
- Analytical properties of Einasto dark matter haloes
- The universal distribution of halo interlopers in projected phase space. Bias in galaxy cluster concentration and velocity anisotropy?
- A New Survey for Giant Arcs
- CoMaLit III. Literature Catalogs of weak Lensing Clusters of galaxies (LC^2)
- Cosmic variance of the galaxy cluster weak lensing signal
- The mass-concentration relation in lensing clusters: the role of statistical biases and selection effects
- New constraints on from a joint analysis of stacked gravitational lensing and clustering of galaxy clusters
- Statistical uncertainties and systematic errors in weak lensing mass estimates of galaxy clusters
- Reconstructing the projected gravitational potential of Abell 1689 from X-ray measurements
- The mass distribution in Spiral galaxies
Cited by in corpus (21)
- Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission
- Weak Lensing Measurement of the Mass--Richness Relation of SDSS redMaPPer Clusters
- Cluster-galaxy weak lensing
- Lensing Constraints on the Mass Profile Shape and the Splashback Radius of Galaxy Clusters
- AMICO galaxy clusters in KiDS-DR3: weak-lensing mass calibration
- The concentration-mass relation of clusters of galaxies from the OmegaWINGS survey
- An Optical Catalog of Galaxy Clusters Obtained from an Adaptive Matched Filter Finder Applied to SDSS DR9 Data
- Measuring galaxy cluster masses with CMB lensing using a Maximum Likelihood estimator: Statistical and systematic error budgets for future experiments
- Stacking Caustic Masses from Galaxy Clusters
- Cosmology with Galaxy Cluster Phase Spaces
- The BAHAMAS project: Evaluating the accuracy of the halo model in predicting the non-linear matter power spectrum
- Testing emergent gravity with mass densities of galaxy clusters
- On Escaping a Galaxy Cluster in an Accelerating Universe
- A universal model for the evolution of tidally stripped systems
- Deriving galaxy cluster velocity anisotropy profiles from a joint analysis of dynamical and weak lensing data
- The XXL survey: XLII. Detection and characterization of the galaxy population of distant galaxy clusters in the XXL-N/VIDEO field: A tale of variety
- Physical modelling of galaxy clusters using Einasto dark matter profiles
- Mass Modeling and Kinematics of Galaxy Clusters in Modified Gravity
- Dynamical cluster masses from photometric surveys
- The Magnification Invariant of Circularly-symmetric Lens Models
- A comprehensive analysis using 9 dark matter halo models on the spiral galaxy NGC 4321