Equivalence between two different field-dependent BRST formulations

Abstract

Finite field-dependent BRST (FFBRST) transformations were constructed by integrating infinitesimal BRST transformation in a closed form. Such a generalized transformations have been extended in various branch of physics and found many applications. Recently BRST transformation has also been generalized with same goal and motivation in slightly different manner. In this work we have shown that the later formulation is conceptually equivalent to the earlier formulation. We justify our claim by producing the same result of later formulation using earlier FFBRST formulation.

6 pages, To appear in Int. J. Theor. Phys

References in corpus (7)

• Off-shell nilpotent finite BRST/anti-BRST transformations
• Finite nilpotent symmetry in Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism
• Finite BRST transformation and constrained systems
• ABJM theory in Batalin-Vilkovisky formulation
• Finite field-dependent BRST symmetry for ABJM theory in $\mathcal{N}=1$ superspace
• The noncovariant gauges in 3-form theories
• Generalized BRST Symmetry and Gaugeon Formalism for Perturbative Quantum Gravity: Novel Observation

Cited by in corpus (7)

• BRST symmetry for Regge-Teitelboim based minisuperspace models
• Exploring new horizons of the Gribov problem in Yang-Mills theories
• Super-group field cosmology in Batalin-Vilkovisky formulation
• Finite BRST Mapping in Higher Derivative Models
• Soft-Collinear Effective Theory: BRST Formulation
• Compact space and infrared behavior of the effective QCD
• Quantum gauge symmetry of reducible gauge theory