Fundamental limitations to high-precision tests of the universality of free fall by dropping atoms
arXiv:1503.01074 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.93.023617
Abstract
Tests of the universality of free fall and the weak equivalence principle probe the foundations of General Relativity. Evidence of a violation may lead to the discovery of a new force. The best torsion balance experiments have ruled it out to 10^-13. Cold-atom drop tests have reached 10^-7 and promise to do 7 to 10 orders of magnitude better, on the ground or in space. They are limited by the random shot noise, which depends on the number N of atoms in the clouds. As mass-dropping experiments in the non-uniform gravitational field of Earth, they are sensitive to the initial conditions. Random accelerations due to initial condition errors of the clouds are designed to be at the same level as shot noise, so that they can be reduced with the number of drops along with it. This sets the requirements for the initial position and velocity spreads of the clouds with given N. In the STE-QUEST space mission proposal aiming at 2x10^-15 they must be about a factor 8 above Heisenberg's principle limit, and the integration time required to reduce both errors is 3 years, with a mission duration of 5 years. Instead, offset errors at release between different atom clouds are systematic and give rise to a systematic effect which mimics a violation. Such offsets must be demonstrated to be as small as required in all drops, must be small by design and must be measured. For STE-QUEST to meet its goal they must be several orders of magnitude smaller than the size of each individual cloud, which in its turn must be at most 8 times larger than the uncertainty principle limit. Even if all technical problems are solved and the clouds are released with negligible systematic errors, still they must be measured. Then, Heisenberg's principle dictates that the measurement lasts as long as the experiment and the systematic nature of the effect requires many measurements for it to be ruled out as a source of violation.
References in corpus (6)
- Test of the Equivalence Principle Using a Rotating Torsion Balance
- Testing General Relativity with Atom Interferometry
- Quantum Test of the Universality of Free Fall
- Test of Einstein Equivalence Principle for 0-spin and half-integer-spin atoms: Search for spin-gravity coupling effects
- STE-QUEST - Test of the Universality of Free Fall Using Cold Atom Interferometry
- Lunar Laser Ranging Tests of the Equivalence Principle
Cited by in corpus (17)
- Testing gravity with cold atom interferometry: Results and prospects
- Effective inertial frame in an atom interferometric test of the equivalence principle
- Circumventing Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in atom interferometry tests of the equivalence principle
- Precision Gravity Tests and the Einstein Equivalence Principle
- Exploring the Foundations of the Universe with Space Tests of the Equivalence Principle
- Relevance of the weak equivalence principle and experiments to test it: lessons from the past and improvements expected in space
- Light propagation and atom interferometry in gravity and dilaton fields
- Gravity gradient suppression in spaceborne atomic tests of the equivalence principle
- Nonclassical effects in geodesic motion
- Full elimination of the gravity-gradient terms in atom interferometry
- Generalized gravity-gradient mitigation scheme
- Systematic errors in high-precision gravity measurements by light-pulse atom interferometry on the ground and in space
- Do general relativistic effects limit experiments to test the universality of free fall and the weak equivalence principle?
- Offset Simultaneous Conjugate Atom Interferometers
- On the first test of the Weak Equivalence Principle in low Earth orbit
- Testing the weak equivalence principle for nonclassical matter with torsion balances
- Quantum interferometry in external gravitational fields