A note relating ridge regression and OLS p-values to preconditioned sparse penalized regression

Abstract

When the design matrix has orthonormal columns, "soft thresholding" the ordinary least squares (OLS) solution produces the Lasso solution [Tibshirani, 1996]. If one uses the Puffer preconditioned Lasso [Jia and Rohe, 2012], then this result generalizes from orthonormal designs to full rank designs (Theorem 1). Theorem 2 refines the Puffer preconditioner to make the Lasso select the same model as removing the elements of the OLS solution with the largest p-values. Using a generalized Puffer preconditioner, Theorem 3 relates ridge regression to the preconditioned Lasso; this result is for the high dimensional setting, p > n. Where the standard Lasso is akin to forward selection [Efron et al., 2004], Theorems 1, 2, and 3 suggest that the preconditioned Lasso is more akin to backward elimination. These results hold for sparse penalties beyond l1; for a broad class of sparse and non-convex techniques (e.g. SCAD and MC+), the results hold for all local minima.

References in corpus (16)

• Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
• Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
• Rejoinder to "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
• Least Angle Regression
• Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
• Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
• Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
• Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
• Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
• Discussion of "Least angle regression" by Efron et al
• Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty
• Regularized M-estimators with nonconvexity: Statistical and algorithmic theory for local optima
• "Pre-conditioning" for feature selection and regression in high-dimensional problems
• Sparse recovery for spherical harmonic expansions
• Preconditioning to comply with the Irrepresentable Condition
• On pattern recovery of the fused Lasso