Phenomenological approaches of inflation and their equivalence
arXiv:1411.7237 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083006
Abstract
In this work, we analyze two possible alternative and model-independent approaches to describe the inflationary period. The first one assumes a general equation of state during inflation due to Mukhanov, while the second one is based on the slow-roll hierarchy suggested by Hoffman and Turner. We find that, remarkably, the two approaches are equivalent from the observational viewpoint, as they single out the same areas in the parameter space, and agree with the inflationary attractors where successful inflation occurs. Rephrased in terms of the familiar picture of a slowly rolling, canonically normalized scalar field, the resulting inflaton excursions in these two approaches are almost identical. Furthermore, once the Galactic dust polarization data from Planck are included in the numerical fits, inflaton excursions can safely take sub-Planckian values.
arXiv commentRevtex, 8 pages, 4 figures. References updated. Matches published version in PRD
References in corpus (32)
- Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models
- Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: a Monte-Carlo approach
- Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results
- Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
- BICEP2 I: Detection Of B-mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales
- Reconstructing the Inflaton Potential --- an Overview
- What would we learn by detecting a gravitational wave signal in the cosmic microwave background anisotropy?
- Natural Inflation: Particle Physics Models, Power Law Spectra for Large Scale Structure, and Constraints from COBE
- Planck 2013 results. XV. CMB power spectra and likelihood
- Hilltop Inflation
- COBE, Gravitational Waves, Inflation and Extended Inflation
- On the Possibility of Large Axion Decay Constants
- Toward an Understanding of Foreground Emission in the BICEP2 Region
- BICEP2 II: Experiment and Three-Year Data Set
- Inflation: flow, fixed points and observables to arbitrary order in slow roll
- Inflation model constraints from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe three-year data
- Quantum Cosmological Perturbations: Predictions and Observations
- A joint analysis of Planck and BICEP2 B modes including dust polarization uncertainty
- Kinematic Constraints to the Key Inflationary Observables
- Universality classes of inflation
- Considerations in optimizing CMB polarization experiments to constrain inflationary physics
- Monte Carlo reconstruction of the inflationary potential
- The large-N running of the spectral index of inflation
- The Lyth Bound Revisited
- or Not : Testing the Simplest Inflationary Potential
- The Lyth Bound of Inflation with a Tilt
- Quantum Gravity Constraints on Inflation
- Latest inflation model constraints from cosmic microwave background measurements
- How much can we learn about the physics of inflation?
- A model-independent fit to Planck and BICEP2 data
- Theoretical bounds on the tensor-to-scalar ratio in the cosmic microwave background
- Planck and WMAP constraints on generalised Hubble flow inflationary trajectories
Cited by in corpus (15)
- Implications of the scalar tilt for the tensor-to-scalar ratio
- Constant-roll tachyon inflation and observational constraints
- Does Current Data Prefer a Non-minimally Coupled Inflaton?
- The reconstruction of inflationary potentials
- Small-Field and Scale-Free: Inflation and Ekpyrosis at their Extremes
- Nonminimal coupling and inflationary attractors
- Reconstruction of constant slow-roll inflation
- The present and future of the most favoured inflationary models after 2015
- Reconstruction of extended inflationary potentials for attractors
- Primordial power spectrum features in phenomenological descriptions of inflation
- The Reconstruction of Non-Minimal Derivative Coupling Inflationary Potentials
- Inflationary attractors from a non-canonical kinetic term
- Inflationary attractors from nonminimal coupling
- Returning Back to Mukhanov Parametrization of Inflationary Equation of State
- Confronting Mukhanov Parametrization of Inflationary Equation-of-State with ACT-DR6