Phenomenological approaches of inflation and their equivalence
arXiv:1411.7237 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083006
Abstract
In this work, we analyze two possible alternative and model-independent approaches to describe the inflationary period. The first one assumes a general equation of state during inflation due to Mukhanov, while the second one is based on the slow-roll hierarchy suggested by Hoffman and Turner. We find that, remarkably, the two approaches are equivalent from the observational viewpoint, as they single out the same areas in the parameter space, and agree with the inflationary attractors where successful inflation occurs. Rephrased in terms of the familiar picture of a slowly rolling, canonically normalized scalar field, the resulting inflaton excursions in these two approaches are almost identical. Furthermore, once the Galactic dust polarization data from Planck are included in the numerical fits, inflaton excursions can safely take sub-Planckian values.
Revtex, 8 pages, 4 figures. References updated. Matches published version in PRD
References in corpus (9)
- Toward an Understanding of Foreground Emission in the BICEP2 Region
- Inflation model constraints from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe three-year data
- A joint analysis of Planck and BICEP2 B modes including dust polarization uncertainty
- or Not : Testing the Simplest Inflationary Potential
- The Lyth Bound of Inflation with a Tilt
- Latest inflation model constraints from cosmic microwave background measurements
- How much can we learn about the physics of inflation?
- A model-independent fit to Planck and BICEP2 data
- Theoretical bounds on the tensor-to-scalar ratio in the cosmic microwave background
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Does Current Data Prefer a Non-minimally Coupled Inflaton?
- Nonminimal coupling and inflationary attractors
- The Reconstruction of Non-Minimal Derivative Coupling Inflationary Potentials
- Inflationary attractors from a non-canonical kinetic term
- Inflationary attractors from nonminimal coupling
- Returning Back to Mukhanov Parametrization of Inflationary Equation of State
- Confronting Mukhanov Parametrization of Inflationary Equation-of-State with ACT-DR6