Variations on Barbalat's Lemma

Abstract

It is not hard to prove that a uniformly continuous real function, whose integral up to infinity exists, vanishes at infinity, and it is probably little known that this statement runs under the name "Barbalat's Lemma." In fact, the latter name is frequently used in control theory, where the lemma is used to obtain Lyapunov-like stability theorems for non-linear and non-autonomous systems. Barbalat's Lemma is qualitative in the sense that it asserts that a function has certain properties, here convergence to zero. Such qualitative statements can typically be proved by "soft analysis", such as indirect proofs. Indeed, in the original 1959 paper by Barbalat, the lemma was proved by contradiction and this proof prevails in the control theory textbooks. In this short note we first give a direct, "hard analyis" proof of the lemma, yielding quantitative results, i.e. rates of convergence to zero. This proof allows also for immediate generalizations. Finally, we unify three different versions which recently appeared and discuss their relation to the original lemma.

5 pages

Cited by in corpus (8)

• Optical Supersymmetry in the Time Domain
• Unconditional finite amplitude stability of a viscoelastic fluid in a mechanically isolated vessel with spatially non-uniform wall temperature
• Unconditional finite amplitude stability of a fluid in a mechanically isolated vessel with spatially non-uniform wall temperature
• A diagrammatic view of differential equations in physics
• Well-posedness of a class of hyperbolic partial differential equations on the semi-axis
• Dissipative extensions and port-Hamiltonian operators on networks
• Nash Equilibrium Learning In Large Populations With First-Order Payoff Modifications
• Einstein-Yang-Mills wormholes haunted by a phantom field