Comparison between hemisphere comparison method and dipole-fitting method in tracing the anisotropic expansion of the Universe use the Union2 dataset

Abstract

Type-Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are often used as the standard candles to probe the anisotropic expansion of the Universe. In this paper, we make a comprehensive comparison between the hemisphere comparison (HC) method and dipole-fitting (DF) method in searching for the cosmological preferred direction using the Union2 dataset, a compilation of 557 well-calibrated SNe Ia. We find that the directions of the faintest SNe Ia derived from these two methods are approximately opposite. Monte Carlo simulations show that the results of the HC method strongly depend on the distribution of the data points in the sky. The coincidence that the HC method and DF method give two completely opposite directions may be due to the extremely nonuniform distribution of the Union2 dataset.

10 pages, 6figures, to appear in MNRAS

References in corpus (6)

• Spectra and Light Curves of Six Type Ia Supernovae at 0.511 < z < 1.12 and the Union2 Compilation
• Spatial variation in the fine-structure constant -- new results from VLT/UVES
• Dipole of the luminosity distance: a direct measure of H(z)
• Testing the Isotropy of the Universe with Type Ia Supernovae
• Bianchi I meets the Hubble diagram
• Constraining anisotropy of the universe from different groups of type-Ia supernovae

Cited by in corpus (2)

• Searching for a cosmological preferred direction with 147 rotationally supported galaxies
• Asymmetry in the reconstructed deceleration parameter