Discussion of "On the Birnbaum Argument for the Strong Likelihood Principle"
arXiv:1411.0807 · doi:10.1214/14-STS470
Abstract
Deborah Mayo claims to have refuted Birnbaum's argument that the Likelihood Principle is a logical consequence of the Sufficiency and Conditionality Principles. However, this claim fails because her interpretation of the Conditionality Principle is different from Birnbaum's. Birnbaum's proof cannot be so readily dismissed. [arXiv:1302.7021]
Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/14-STS470 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)