A systematic bias in the calculation of spectral density from a 3D spatial grid

Abstract

The energy spectral density $E(k)$, where $k$ is the spatial wave number, is a well-known diagnostic of homogeneous turbulence and magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. However in most of the curves plotted by different authors, some systematic kinks can be observed at $k=9$, $k=15$ and $k=19$. We claim that these kinks have no physical meaning, and are in fact the signature of the method which is used to estimate $E(k)$ from a 3D spatial grid. In this paper we give another method, in order to get rid of the spurious kinks and to estimate $E(k)$ much more accurately.

arXiv comment4 pages, in PRE

References in corpus (8)

• Shell to shell energy transfer in MHD, Part I: steady state turbulence
• Shell Models of Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence
• Bottleneck effect in three-dimensional turbulence simulations
• Is nonhelical hydromagnetic turbulence peaked at small scales?
• Non-local interactions in hydrodynamic turbulence at high Reynolds numbers: the slow emergence of scaling laws
• Large-scale dynamos at low magnetic Prandtl numbers
• Dynamo action at low magnetic Prandtl numbers: mean flow vs. fully turbulent motion
• Modes and instabilities in magnetized spherical Couette flow

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Energy Spectra and Fluxes in Dissipation Range of Turbulent and Laminar Flows
• Prandtl number dependence of the small-scale properties in turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection
• Comparison of forcing functions in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence
• Dynamic regimes in planetary cores: τ-{\ell} diagrams