Controversy and Sentiment in Online News
arXiv:1409.8152
Abstract
How do news sources tackle controversial issues? In this work, we take a data-driven approach to understand how controversy interplays with emotional expression and biased language in the news. We begin by introducing a new dataset of controversial and non-controversial terms collected using crowdsourcing. Then, focusing on 15 major U.S. news outlets, we compare millions of articles discussing controversial and non-controversial issues over a span of 7 months. We find that in general, when it comes to controversial issues, the use of negative affect and biased language is prevalent, while the use of strong emotion is tempered. We also observe many differences across news sources. Using these findings, we show that we can indicate to what extent an issue is controversial, by comparing it with other issues in terms of how they are portrayed across different media.
arXiv commentComputation+Journalism Symposium 2014
Cited by in corpus (13)
- Community Interaction and Conflict on the Web
- Polarization and Fake News: Early Warning of Potential Misinformation Targets
- A Framework for Quantifying Controversy of Social Network Debates Using Attributed Networks: Biased Random Walk (BRW)
- Controversial information spreads faster and further in Reddit
- Viewpoint Discovery and Understanding in Social Networks
- A Motif-based Approach for Identifying Controversy
- Something's Brewing! Early Prediction of Controversy-causing Posts from Discussion Features
- Quantifying Controversy in Social Media
- Linguistic Characterization of Divisive Topics Online: Case Studies on Contentiousness in Abortion, Climate Change, and Gun Control
- Exposing Twitter Users to Contrarian News
- Topic-Specific Sentiment Analysis Can Help Identify Political Ideology
- Characterizing behavioral trends in a community driven discussion platform
- Reducing Controversy by Connecting Opposing Views