A Pragmatic Interpretation of Quantum Logic

Abstract

Scholars have wondered for a long time whether the language of quantum mechanics introduces a quantum notion of truth which is formalized by quantum logic (QL) and is incompatible with the classical (Tarskian) notion. We show that QL can be interpreted as a pragmatic language of assertive formulas which formalize statements about physical systems that are empirically justified or unjustified in the framework of quantum mechanics. According to this interpretation, QL formalizes properties of the metalinguistic notion of empirical justification within quantum mechanics rather than properties of a quantum notion of truth. This conclusion agrees with a general integrationist perspective that interprets nonstandard logics as theories of metalinguistic notions different from truth, thus avoiding incompatibility with classical notions and preserving the globality of logic. By the way, some elucidations of the standard notion of quantum truth are also obtained. Key words: pragmatics, quantum logic, quantum mechanics, justifiability, global pluralism.

Third version: 20 pages. Sects. 1, 2, and 4 rewritten and improved. Explanations added

References in corpus (8)

• Hidden Variables and the Two Theorems of John Bell
• Categorical Proof Theory of Co-Intuitionistic Linear Logic
• Recovering Quantum Logic within an Extended Classical Framework
• A Pragmatic Interpretation of Quantum Logic
• Outline of a Generalization and a Reinterpretation of Quantum Mechanics Recovering Objectivity
• A survey of the ESR model for an objective reinterpretation of quantum mechanics
• Finite Local Models for the GHZ Experiment
• Philosophical Aspects of Quantum Information Theory

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
• Throwing bridges: where and how can classical and quantum view be connected?
• Kolmogorovian versus non-Kolmogorovian probabilities in contextual theories