Population fluctuation promotes cooperation in networks
arXiv:1407.8032 · doi:10.1038/srep11054
Abstract
We consider the problem of explaining the emergence and evolution of cooperation in dynamic network-structured populations. Building on seminal work by Poncela et al, which shows how cooperation (in one-shot prisoner's dilemma) is supported in growing populations by an evolutionary preferential attachment (EPA) model, we investigate the effect of fluctuations in the population size. We find that the fluctuating model is more robust than Poncela et al's in that cooperation flourishes for a wide variety of initial conditions. In terms of both the temptation to defect, and the types of strategies present in the founder network, the fluctuating population is found to lead more securely to cooperation. Further, we find that this model will also support the emergence of cooperation from pre-existing non-cooperative random networks. This model, like Poncela et al's, does not require agents to have memory, recognition of other agents, or other cognitive abilities, and so may suggest a more general explanation of the emergence of cooperation in early evolutionary transitions, than mechanisms such as kin selection, direct and indirect reciprocity.
Published in Nature Scientific Reports 2015
References in corpus (8)
- Evolutionary games on graphs
- Co-evolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking
- Making new connections towards cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game
- Complex cooperative networks from evolutionary preferential attachment
- Impact of aging on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game
- Evolution of cooperation on scale-free networks subject to error and attack
- Coevolution of strategies and update rules in the Prisoner's Dilemma game on complex networks
- Robustness of cooperation on scale-free networks under continuous topological change