On the constants of the Bohnenblust-Hille inequality and Hardy--Littlewood inequalities
arXiv:1407.7120
Abstract
In this paper, among other results, we improve the best known estimates for the constants of the generalized Bohnenblust-Hille inequality. These enhancements are then used to improve the best known constants of the Hardy--Littlewood inequality; this inequality asserts that for a positive integer with and or there exists a constant such that, for all continuous --linear forms , and all positive integers ,% \[ \left( \sum_{j_{1},...,j_{m}=1}^{n}\left\vert T(e_{j_{1}},...,e_{j_{m}% })\right\vert ^{\frac{2mp}{mp+p-2m}}\right) ^{\frac{mp+p-2m}{2mp}}\leq C_{m,p}^{\mathbb{K}}\left\Vert T\right\Vert , \] and the exponent is sharp. In particular, we show that for the optimal constants satisfying the above inequality are dominated by the best known estimates for the constants of the -linear Bohnenblust--Hille inequality. More precisely if denotes the Euler--Mascheroni constant, considering the case of complex scalars as an illustration, we show that% \[ C_{m,p}^{\mathbb{C}}\leq\prod\limits_{j=2}^{m}Γ\left( 2-\frac{1}% {j}\right) ^{\frac{j}{2-2j}}<m^{\frac{1-γ}{2}}, \] which is somewhat surprising since this new formula has no dependence on (the former estimate depends on but, paradoxally, is worse than this new one). This suggests the following open problems: 1) Are the optimal constants of the Hardy--Littlewood inequality and Bohnenblust--Hille inequalities the same? 2) Are the optimal constants of the Hardy--Littlewood inequality independent of (at least for large )?