Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States: A General Approach
arXiv:1407.6333
Abstract
Building upon developments in theoretical and applied machine learning, as well as the efforts of various scholars including Guimera and Sales-Pardo (2011), Ruger et al. (2004), and Martin et al. (2004), we construct a model designed to predict the voting behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. Using the extremely randomized tree method first proposed in Geurts, et al. (2006), a method similar to the random forest approach developed in Breiman (2001), as well as novel feature engineering, we predict more than sixty years of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States (1953-2013). Using only data available prior to the date of decision, our model correctly identifies 69.7% of the Court's overall affirm and reverse decisions and correctly forecasts 70.9% of the votes of individual justices across 7,700 cases and more than 68,000 justice votes. Our performance is consistent with the general level of prediction offered by prior scholars. However, our model is distinctive as it is the first robust, generalized, and fully predictive model of Supreme Court voting behavior offered to date. Our model predicts six decades of behavior of thirty Justices appointed by thirteen Presidents. With a more sound methodological foundation, our results represent a major advance for the science of quantitative legal prediction and portend a range of other potential applications, such as those described in Katz (2013).
arXiv comment17 pages, 6 figures; source available at https://github.com/mjbommar/scotus-predict
Cited by in corpus (7)
- A General Approach for Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States
- Exploring the Use of Text Classification in the Legal Domain
- Predicting and Understanding Law-Making with Word Vectors and an Ensemble Model
- Performance in the Courtroom: Automated Processing and Visualization of Appeal Court Decisions in France
- Classifying Patent Applications with Ensemble Methods
- Predicting Court Decisions for Alimony: Avoiding Extra-legal Factors in Decision made by Judges and Not Understandable AI Models
- Law on the Market? Abnormal Stock Returns and Supreme Court Decision-Making