Code Review For and By Scientists
arXiv:1407.5648
Abstract
We describe two pilot studies of code review by and for scientists. Our principal findings are that scientists are enthusiastic, but need to be shown code review in action, and that just-in-time review of small code changes is more likely to succeed than large-scale end-of-work reviews.
4 pages
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Fundamental concepts in the Cyclus nuclear fuel cycle simulation framework
- Report on the Third Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE3)
- Report on the Second Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE2)
- Second Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences (WSSSPE2): Submission, Peer-Review and Sorting Process, and Results
- It Takes a Socio-Technical Ecosystem