Sample variance in N--body simulations and impact on tomographic shear predictions
arXiv:1406.5374 · doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/16
Abstract
We study the effects of sample variance in N--body simulations, as a function of the size of the simulation box, namely in connection with predictions on tomographic shear spectra. We make use of a set of 8 CDM simulations in boxes of 128, 256, 512 Mpc aside, for a total of 24, differing just by the initial seeds. Among the simulations with 128 and 512 Mpc aside, we suitably select those closest and farthest from {\it average}. Numerical and linear spectra are suitably connected at low so to evaluate the effects of sample variance on shear spectra for 5 or 10 tomographic bands. We find that shear spectra obtained by using 128 Mpc simulations can vary up to , just because of the seed. Sample variance lowers to , when using 512 Mpc. These very percentages could however slightly vary, if other sets of the same number of realizations were considered. Accordingly, in order to match the precision expected for data, if still using 8 boxes, we require a size -- Mpc for them.
accepted by ApJ
References in corpus (10)
- Cosmological viability of f(R)-gravity as an ideal fluid and its compatibility with a matter dominated phase
- Are f(R) dark energy models cosmologically viable ?
- A critical look at cosmological perturbation theory techniques
- Super-Sample Covariance in Simulations
- Simulations of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations II: Covariance matrix of the matter power spectrum
- Separating intrinsic alignment and galaxy-galaxy lensing
- Super-Sample Signal
- Non-linear weak lensing forecasts
- Gravitational Lensing Constraints on Dynamical and Coupled Dark Energy
- Large-Scale Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxy Images
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Euclid: impact of nonlinear prescriptions on cosmological parameter estimation from weak lensing cosmic shear
- Sample variance in weak lensing: how many simulations are required?
- Cosmology with photometric weak lensing surveys: constraints with redshift tomography of convergence peaks and moments
- Constraining the halo mass function with observations