Comments on "IEEE 1588 Clock Synchronization using Dual Slave Clocks in a Slave"
arXiv:1404.1311 · doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2014.2317738
Abstract
In the above letter, Chin and Chen proposed an IEEE 1588 clock synchronization method based on dual slave clocks, where they claim that multiple unknown parameters --- i.e., clock offset, clock skew, and master-to-slave delay --- can be estimated with only one-way time transfers using more equations than usual. This comment investigates Chin and Chen's dual clock scheme with detailed models for a master and dual slave clocks and shows that the formulation of multi-parameter estimation is invalid, which affirms that it is impossible to distinguish the effect of delay from that of clock offset at a slave even with dual slave clocks.
2 pages, 1 figure
Cited by in corpus (3)
- Energy-Efficient Time Synchronization Based on Asynchronous Source Clock Frequency Recovery and Reverse Two-Way Message Exchanges in Wireless Sensor Networks
- Simulation Study of an Energy-Efficient Time Synchronization Scheme based on Source Clock Frequency Recovery in Asymmetric Wireless Sensor Networks
- On enery-efficient time synchronization based on source clock frequency recovery in wireless sensor networks