Effective two-dimensional model does not account for geometry sensing by self-organized proteins patterns - Supplementary document
arXiv:1403.5934 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1220971111
Abstract
Here we provide a thorough discussion of the model for Min protein dynamics proposed by Schweizer et al. [11]. The manuscript serves as supplementary document for our letter to the editor to appear in PNAS. Our analysis is based on the original COMSOL simulation files that were used for the publication. We show that all computational data in Schweizer et al. rely on exploitation of simulation artifacts and various unmentioned modifications of model parameters that strikingly contradict the experimental setup and experimental data. We find that the model neither accounts for MinE membrane interactions nor for any observed MinDE protein patterns. All conclusions drawn from the computational model are void. There is no evidence at all that persistent MinE membrane binding has any role in geometry sensing.
supplementary document, 24 pages, 9 figures
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Self-organization principles of intracellular pattern formation
- Sensing the shape of a cell with reaction-diffusion and energy minimization
- Regulation of Pom cluster dynamics in Myxococcus xanthus
- Critical Waves and the Length Problem of Biology
- Pattern orientation in finite domains without boundaries
- Response to Halatek and Frey: Effective two-dimensional model does account for geometry sensing by self-organized proteins patterns