The Non-Signalling theorem in generalizations of Bell's theorem

Abstract

Does "epistemic non-signalling" ensure the peaceful coexistence of special relativity and quantum nonlocality? The possibility of an affirmative answer is of great importance to deterministic approaches to quantum mechanics given recent developments towards generalizations of Bell's theorem. By generalizations of Bell's theorem we here mean efforts that seek to demonstrate the impossibility of any deterministic theories to obey the predictions of Bell's theorem, including even nonlocal hidden-variables theories such as de Broglie-Bohm theory. The present work offers arguments showing why such efforts towards generalization may fall short of their stated goal. In particular, we reject the use of the non-signalling theorem as an argument against the logical possibility of deterministic quantum theories. We proceed by presenting an entirely informal treatment of key physical and metaphysical assumptions, and of their interrelationship, in attempts seeking to generalize Bell's theorem on the basis of an ontic, foundational interpretation of the non-signalling theorem. We here argue that the non-signalling theorem must instead be viewed as an epistemic, phenomenological, or operational theorem i.e. one that refers exclusively to what epistemic agents can, or rather cannot, do. That is, we emphasize that the non-signalling theorem is a theorem about the operational inability of epistemic agents, e.g. human observers, to signal information. A major reason in favor of our conclusion is that any definition of signalling or of non-signalling invariably requires a reference to epistemic agents, and what these agents can actually measure and report; otherwise, the non-signalling theorem would equal a general "no-influence" theorem.

arXiv comment8 pages, 2 figures, 1 table; talk presented at the 2nd international symposium on "Emergent Quantum Mechanics" (Vienna, Austria, 3-6 October, 2013), (http://www.emqm13.org/) To be published in J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. (2014)

References in corpus (13)

• Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions
• Random Numbers Certified by Bell's Theorem
• Free-Space distribution of entanglement and single photons over 144 km
• Violation of Bell inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart
• No Signalling and Quantum Key Distribution
• Bell violation with entangled photons, free of the fair-sampling assumption
• Free randomness can be amplified
• No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power
• Full randomness from arbitrarily deterministic events
• Signal-Locality in Hidden-Variables Theories
• Space-like Separation in a Bell Test assuming Gravitationally Induced Collapses
• Experimenter's Freedom in Bell's Theorem and Quantum Cryptography
• A lower bound for the velocity of quantum communications in the preferred frame

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Nonlocal quantum information transfer without superluminal signalling and communication
• Vacuum Landscaping: Cause of Nonlocal Influences without Signaling
• Is the World Local or Nonlocal? Towards an Emergent Quantum Mechanics in the 21st Century
• The super-indeterminism in orthodox quantum mechanics does not implicate the reality of experimenter free will