Analyzing Search Topology Without Running Any Search: On the Connection Between Causal Graphs and h+
arXiv:1401.3890 · doi:10.1613/jair.3276
Abstract
The ignoring delete lists relaxation is of paramount importance for both satisficing and optimal planning. In earlier work, it was observed that the optimal relaxation heuristic h+ has amazing qualities in many classical planning benchmarks, in particular pertaining to the complete absence of local minima. The proofs of this are hand-made, raising the question whether such proofs can be lead automatically by domain analysis techniques. In contrast to earlier disappointing results -- the analysis method has exponential runtime and succeeds only in two extremely simple benchmark domains -- we herein answer this question in the affirmative. We establish connections between causal graph structure and h+ topology. This results in low-order polynomial time analysis methods, implemented in a tool we call TorchLight. Of the 12 domains where the absence of local minima has been proved, TorchLight gives strong success guarantees in 8 domains. Empirically, its analysis exhibits strong performance in a further 2 of these domains, plus in 4 more domains where local minima may exist but are rare. In this way, TorchLight can distinguish easy domains from hard ones. By summarizing structural reasons for analysis failure, TorchLight also provides diagnostic output indicating domain aspects that may cause local minima.
References in corpus (6)
- The FF Planning System: Fast Plan Generation Through Heuristic Search
- Planning Through Stochastic Local Search and Temporal Action Graphs in LPG
- The Automatic Inference of State Invariants in TIM
- Structure and Complexity in Planning with Unary Operators
- The Role of Macros in Tractable Planning
- Planning over Chain Causal Graphs for Variables with Domains of Size 5 Is NP-Hard