On the comparison between MASS and G-SCIDAR techniques

Abstract

The Multi Aperture Scintillation Sensor (MASS) and the Generalized-Scintillation Detection and Ranging (Generalized SCIDAR) are two instruments conceived to measure the optical turbulence (OT) vertical distribution on the whole troposphere and low stratosphere (~ 20 km) widely used in the astronomical context. In this paper we perform a detailed analysis/comparison of measurements provided by the two instruments and taken during the extended site testing campaign carried out on 2007 at Cerro Paranal and promoted by the European Southern Observatory (ESO). The main and final goal of the study is to provide a detailed estimation of the measurements reliability i.e dispersion of turbulence measurements done by the two instruments at different heights above the ground. This information is directly related to our ability in estimating the absolute value of the turbulence stratification. To better analyse the uncertainties between the MASS and the GS we took advantage of the availability of measurements taken during the same campaign by a third independent instrument (DIMM - Differential Imaging Motion Monitor) measuring the integrated turbulence extended on the whole 20 km. Such a cross-check comparison permitted us to define the reliability of the instruments and their measurements, their limits and the contexts in which their use can present some risk.

: 24 pages; 17 figures; MNRAS accepted on 11 November 2013

References in corpus (10)

• Adaptive Optics for Astronomy
• MOSE: optical turbulence and atmospherical parameters operational forecast at ESO ground-based sites. I: Overview and atmospherical parameters vertical stratification on [0-20] km
• Tomographic reconstruction for Wide Field Adaptive Optics systems: Fourier domain analysis and fundamental limitations
• European Extremely Large Telescope Site Characterization II: High angular resolution parameters
• Wind speed vertical distribution at Mt. Graham
• MOSE: optical turbulence and atmospherical parameters operational forecast at ESO ground-based sites. II: atmospherical parameters in the surface layer [0-30] m
• Monte-Carlo simulation of ELT scale multi-object adaptive optics deformable mirror requirements and tolerances
• Atmospheric optical-turbulence at Roque de los Muchachos Observatory: database and recalibration of the generalized-SCIDAR data
• Stellar scintillation in short exposure regime and atmospheric coherence time evaluation
• Re-calibrated Generalized-Scidar measurements at Cerro Paranal (VLT's site)

Cited by in corpus (8)

• Optical turbulence profiling with Stereo-SCIDAR for VLT and ELT
• Optical turbulence forecast: ready for an operational application
• A comparison of next-generation turbulence profiling instruments at Paranal
• Characterisation of the ground layer of turbulence at Paranal using a robotic SLODAR system
• Pushing Point spread function reconstruction to the next level. Application to SPHERE/ZIMPOL
• Joint estimation of atmospheric and instrumental defects using a parsimonious point spread function model.On-sky validation using state of the art worldwide adaptive-optics assisted instruments
• Integrated turbulence parameters' estimation from NAOMI adaptive optics telemetry data
• PEPITO: atmospheric Profiling from short-Exposure focalPlane Images in seeing-limiTed mOde