On the Relation between the Psychological and Thermodynamic Arrows of Time
arXiv:1310.1095 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.89.052102
Abstract
In this paper we lay out an argument that generically the psychological arrow of time should align with the thermodynamic arrow of time where that arrow is well-defined. This argument applies to any physical system that can act as a memory, in the sense of preserving a record of the state of some other system. This result follows from two principles: the robustness of the thermodynamic arrow of time to small perturbations in the state, and the principle that a memory should not have to be fine-tuned to match the state of the system being recorded. This argument applies even if the memory system itself is completely reversible and non-dissipative. We make the argument with a paradigmatic system, then formulate it more broadly for any system that can be considered a memory. We illustrate these principles for a few other example systems, and compare our criteria to earlier treatments of this problem.
9 pages, 1 figure
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Autonomous quantum clocks: does thermodynamics limit our ability to measure time?
- Operational quantum theory without predefined time
- Operational formulation of time reversal in quantum theory
- The arrow of time in operational formulations of quantum theory
- Quantum superposition of thermodynamic evolutions with opposing time's arrows
- Thermodynamics of Encoding and Encoders
- Information dynamics and the arrow of time