Detecting induced subgraphs
arXiv:1309.0971 · doi:10.1016/j.dam.2009.02.015
Abstract
An \emph{s-graph} is a graph with two kinds of edges: \emph{subdivisible} edges and \emph{real} edges. A \emph{realisation} of an s-graph is any graph obtained by subdividing subdivisible edges of into paths of arbitrary length (at least one). Given an s-graph , we study the decision problem whose instance is a graph and question is "Does contain a realisation of as an induced subgraph?". For several 's, the complexity of is known and here we give the complexity for several more. Our NP-completeness proofs for 's rely on the NP-completeness proof of the following problem. Let be a set of graphs and be an integer. Let be the problem whose instance is where is a graph whose maximum degree is at most d, with no induced subgraph in and are two non-adjacent vertices of degree 2. The question is "Does contain an induced cycle passing through ?". Among several results, we prove that is NP-complete. We give a simple criterion on a connected graph to decide whether is polynomial or NP-complete. The polynomial cases rely on the algorithm three-in-a-tree, due to Chudnovsky and Seymour.
arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1308.6678
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (9)
- A structure theorem for graphs with no cycle with a unique chord and its consequences
- On graphs with no induced subdivision of
- Three-in-a-Tree in Near Linear Time
- The -in-a-tree problem for graphs of girth at least~
- Graphs that do not contain a cycle with a node that has at least two neighbors on it
- Treewidth versus clique number. I. Graph classes with a forbidden structure
- Finding an induced subdivision of a digraph
- Detecting an induced net subdivision
- The (theta, wheel)-free graphs Part IV: induced paths and cycles