paper

Detecting induced subgraphs

arXiv:1309.0971 · doi:10.1016/j.dam.2009.02.015

Abstract

An \emph{s-graph} is a graph with two kinds of edges: \emph{subdivisible} edges and \emph{real} edges. A \emph{realisation} of an s-graph is any graph obtained by subdividing subdivisible edges of into paths of arbitrary length (at least one). Given an s-graph , we study the decision problem whose instance is a graph and question is "Does contain a realisation of as an induced subgraph?". For several 's, the complexity of is known and here we give the complexity for several more. Our NP-completeness proofs for 's rely on the NP-completeness proof of the following problem. Let be a set of graphs and be an integer. Let be the problem whose instance is where is a graph whose maximum degree is at most d, with no induced subgraph in and are two non-adjacent vertices of degree 2. The question is "Does contain an induced cycle passing through ?". Among several results, we prove that is NP-complete. We give a simple criterion on a connected graph to decide whether is polynomial or NP-complete. The polynomial cases rely on the algorithm three-in-a-tree, due to Chudnovsky and Seymour.

arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1308.6678

References in corpus (3)

Cited by in corpus (9)