Subgroup decomposition in , Part IV: Relatively irreducible subgroups
arXiv:1306.4711
Abstract
This is the fourth and last in a series of four papers (with research announcement posted on this arXiv) that develop a decomposition theory for subgroups of . In this paper we develop general ping-pong techniques for the action of on the space of lines of . Using these techniques we prove the main results stated in the research announcement, Theorem C and its special case Theorem I, the latter of which says that for any finitely generated subgroup of that acts trivially on homology with coefficients, and for any free factor system that does not consist of (the conjugacy classes of) a complementary pair of free factors of nor of a rank free factor, if is fully irreducible relative to then has an element that is fully irreducible relative to . We also prove Theorem J which, under the additional hypothesis that is geometric relative to , describes a strong relation between and a mapping class group of a surface. v3 and 4: Strengthened statements of the main theorems, highlighting the role of the finite generation hypothesis, and providing an alternative hypothesis. Strengthened proofs of lamination ping-pong, and a strengthened conclusion in Theorem J, for further applications.
32 pages. Contains ross references to other parts of this series. All other parts of this series, including the research announcement, are found on this arXiv
References in corpus (5)
- Subgroup classification in Out(F_n)
- Subgroup decomposition in Out(F_n), Part I: Geometric Models
- Subgroup decomposition in Out(F_n), Part II: A relative Kolchin theorem
- Subgroup decomposition in Out(F_n): Introduction and Research Announcement
- Subgroup decomposition in , Part III: Weak attraction theory
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Boundaries of relative factor graphs and subgroup classification for automorphisms of free products
- Subgroup decomposition in Out(F_n), Part I: Geometric Models
- Subgroup decomposition in Out(F_n): Introduction and Research Announcement
- A short proof of Handel and Mosher's alternative for subgroups of
- Subgroup decomposition in , Part III: Weak attraction theory
- Hyperbolic actions and 2nd bounded cohomology of subgroups of . Part I: Infinite lamination subgroups