Algebraicity and implicit definability in set theory

Abstract

We analyze the effect of replacing several natural uses of definability in set theory by the weaker model-theoretic notion of algebraicity. We find, for example, that the class of hereditarily ordinal algebraic sets is the same as the class of hereditarily ordinal definable sets, that is, HOA = HOD. Moreover, we show that every (pointwise) algebraic model of ZF is actually pointwise definable. Finally, we consider the implicitly constructible universe Imp---an algebraic analogue of the constructible universe---which is obtained by iteratively adding not only the sets that are definable over what has been built so far, but also those that are algebraic (or equivalently, implicitly definable) over the existing structure. While we know Imp can differ from L, the subtler properties of this new inner model are just now coming to light. Many questions remain open.

10 pages. Commentary on this paper can be made at http://jdh.hamkins.org/algebraicity-and-implicit-definability. (v2 makes minor improvements.)

References in corpus (1)

• Satisfaction is not absolute

Cited by in corpus (7)

• The exact strength of the class forcing theorem
• Recognizable sets and Woodin cardinals: Computation beyond the constructible universe
• Ehrenfeucht's lemma in set theory
• Typicality à la Russell in set theory
• The set-theoretic universe $V$ is not necessarily a class-forcing extension of HOD
• A product forcing model in which the Russell-nontypical sets satisfy ZFC strictly between HOD and the universe
• Indiscernible pairs of countable sets of reals at a given projective level