If cooperation is likely punish mildly: Insights from economic experiments based on the snowdrift game
arXiv:1304.4928 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064677
Abstract
Punishment may deter antisocial behavior. Yet to punish is costly, and the costs often do not offset the gains that are due to elevated levels of cooperation. However, the effectiveness of punishment depends not only on how costly it is, but also on the circumstances defining the social dilemma. Using the snowdrift game as the basis, we have conducted a series of economic experiments to determine whether severe punishment is more effective than mild punishment. We have observed that severe punishment is not necessarily more effective, even if the cost of punishment is identical in both cases. The benefits of severe punishment become evident only under extremely adverse conditions, when to cooperate is highly improbable in the absence of sanctions. If cooperation is likely, mild punishment is not less effective and leads to higher average payoffs, and is thus the much preferred alternative. Presented results suggest that the positive effects of punishment stem not only from imposed fines, but may also have a psychological background. Small fines can do wonders in motivating us to chose cooperation over defection, but without the paralyzing effect that may be brought about by large fines. The later should be utilized only when absolutely necessary.
15 pages, 6 figures; accepted for publication in PLoS ONE
References in corpus (6)
- Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game
- Phase diagrams for the spatial public goods game with pool-punishment
- Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions
- Self-organization of punishment in structured populations
- Evolutionary advantages of adaptive rewarding
- Sustainable institutionalized punishment requires elimination of second-order free-riders
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Evolutionary mixed games in structured populations: Cooperation and the benefits of heterogeneity
- A double-edged sword: Benefits and pitfalls of heterogeneous punishment in evolutionary inspection games
- Peer pressure: enhancement of cooperation through mutual punishment
- Eco-evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in the presence of policing
- Cooperation in regular lattices
- Cheating is evolutionarily assimilated with cooperation in the continuous snowdrift game
- Evolution of trust in a hierarchical population with punishing investors
- Criticality and Griffiths phases in random games with quenched disorder