Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie?

Abstract

This article presents results from the first statistically significant study of cost escalation in transportation infrastructure projects. Based on a sample of 258 transportation infrastructure projects worth US$90 billion and representing different project types, geographical regions, and historical periods, it is found with overwhelming statistical significance that the cost estimates used to decide whether such projects should be built are highly and systematically misleading. Underestimation cannot be explained by error and is best explained by strategic misrepresentation, that is, lying. The policy implications are clear: legislators, administrators, investors, media representatives, and members of the public who value honest numbers should not trust cost estimates and cost-benefit analyses produced by project promoters and their analysts.

40 pages

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Why Mass Media Matter to Planning Research: The Case of Megaprojects
• What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects?"
• Cost Overruns and Demand Shortfalls in Urban Rail and Other Infrastructure
• How Planners Deal with Uncomfortable Knowledge: The Dubious Ethics of the American Planning Association