Do scientists trace hot topics?

Abstract

Do scientists follow hot topics in their scientific investigations? In this paper, by performing analysis to papers published in the American Physical Society (APS) Physical Review journals, it is found that papers are more likely to be attracted by hot fields, where the hotness of a field is measured by the number of papers belonging to the field. This indicates that scientists generally do follow hot topics. However, there are qualitative differences among scientists from various countries, among research works regarding different number of authors, different number of affiliations and different number of references. These observations could be valuable for policy makers when deciding research funding and also for individual researchers when searching for scientific projects.

References in corpus (6)

• Emergence of scaling in random networks
• Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks
• Measuring preferential attachment for evolving networks
• Measuring social dynamics in a massive multiplayer online game
• Disassortative mixing in online social networks
• Emergence of Global Preferential Attachment From Local Interaction

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Characterizing and Modeling the Dynamics of Activity and Popularity
• Quantifying patterns of research interest evolution
• The Aging Effect in Evolving Scientific Citation Networks
• Do Mathematicians, Economists and Biomedical Scientists Trace Large Topics More Strongly Than Physicists?
• From Symbols to Embeddings: A Tale of Two Representations in Computational Social Science
• Conservative adventurers have more future academic impact