How much do different ways of calculating percentiles influence the derived performance indicators? - A case study
arXiv:1302.6392 · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-0984-x
Abstract
Bibliometric indicators can be determined by comparing specific citation records with the percentiles of a reference set. However, there exists an ambiguity in the computation of percentiles because usually a significant number of papers with the same citation count are found at the border between percentile rank classes. The present case study of the citations to the journal Europhysics Letters (EPL) in comparison with all physics papers from the Web of Science shows the deviations which occur due to the different ways of treating the tied papers in the evaluation of the percentage of highly cited publications. A strong bias can occur, if the papers tied at the threshold number of citations are all considered as highly cited or all considered as not highly cited.
12 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables, accepted for publication in Scientometrics
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (5)
- The precision of the arithmetic mean, geometric mean and percentiles for citation data: An experimental simulation modelling approach
- Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator
- Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis
- On some properties of medians, percentiles, baselines, and thresholds in empirical bibliometric analysis
- How to improve the outcome of performance evaluations in terms of percentiles for citation frequencies of my papers