Effect of noise on generalized synchronization of chaos: theory and experiment
arXiv:1302.4078 · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2011-11019-1
Abstract
The influence of noise on the generalized synchronization regime in the chaotic systems with dissipative coupling is considered. If attractors of the drive and response systems have an infinitely large basin of attraction, generalized synchronization is shown to possess a great stability with respect to noise. The reasons of the revealed particularity are explained by means of the modified system approach [A.E. Hramov, A.A. Koronovskii, Phys. Rev. E. 71, 067201 (2005)] and confirmed by the results of numerical calculations and experimental studies. The main results are illustrated using the examples of unidirectionally coupled chaotic oscillators and discrete maps as well as spatially extended dynamical systems. Different types of the model noise are analyzed. Possible applications of the revealed particularity are briefly discussed.
23 pages, 13 figures
References in corpus (12)
- An approach to chaotic synchronization
- Generalized synchronization: a modified system approach
- Generalized synchronization of chaos for secure communication: remarkable stability to noise
- Time scale synchronization of chaotic oscillators
- Detecting synchronization of self-sustained oscillators by external driving with varying frequency
- First experimental observation of generalized synchronization phenomena in microwave oscillators
- Detection of synchronization from univariate data using wavelet transform
- Are generalized synchronization and noise--induced synchronization identical types of synchronous behavior of chaotic oscillators?
- Generalized synchronization in coupled Ginzburg-Landau equations and mechanisms of its arising
- The lengths distribution of laminar phases for type-I intermittency in the presence of noise
- Chaotic synchronization of coupled electron-wave systems with backward waves
- Comment on 'Secure Communication using mesoscopic coherent states', Barbosa et al, Phys Rev Lett 90, 227901 (2003)