paper

On the Acceptability of Arguments in Preference-Based Argumentation

arXiv:1301.7358

Abstract

Argumentation is a promising model for reasoning with uncertain knowledge. The key concept of acceptability enables to differentiate arguments and counterarguments: The certainty of a proposition can then be evaluated through the most acceptable arguments for that proposition. In this paper, we investigate different complementary points of view: - an acceptability based on the existence of direct counterarguments, - an acceptability based on the existence of defenders. Pursuing previous work on preference-based argumentation principles, we enforce both points of view by taking into account preference orderings for comparing arguments. Our approach is illustrated in the context of reasoning with stratified knowldge bases.

Appears in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI1998)

Cited by in corpus (7)