Bayes and Frequentism: a Particle Physicist's perspective

Abstract

In almost every scientific field, an experiment involves collecting data and then analysing it. The analysis stage will often consist in trying to extract some physical parameter and estimating its uncertainty; this is known as Parameter Determination. An example would be the determination of the mass of the top quark, from data collected from high energy proton-proton collisions. A different aim is to choose between two possible hypotheses. For example, are data on the recession speed s of distant galaxies proportional to their distance d, or do they fit better to a model where the expansion of the Universe is accelerating? There are two fundamental approaches to such statistical analyses - Bayesian and Frequentist. This article discusses the way they differ in their approach to probability, and then goes on to consider how this affects the way they deal with Parameter Determination and Hypothesis Testing. The examples are taken from every-day life and from Particle Physics.

References in corpus (1)

• Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Profile Likelihoods in Cosmology: When, Why and How illustrated with $\Lambda$CDM, Massive Neutrinos and Dark Energy
• Statistical unfolding of elementary particle spectra: Empirical Bayes estimation and bias-corrected uncertainty quantification
• Probabilistic treatment of the uncertainty from the finite size of weighted Monte Carlo data
• Reporting Results in High Energy Physics Publications: a Manifesto
• Born Rule and Logical Inference in Quantum Mechanics