Manipulating Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: simple, easy and tempting

Abstract

The launch of Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics may provoke a revolution in the research evaluation field as it places within every researchers reach tools that allow bibliometric measuring. In order to alert the research community over how easily one can manipulate the data and bibliometric indicators offered by Google s products we present an experiment in which we manipulate the Google Citations profiles of a research group through the creation of false documents that cite their documents, and consequently, the journals in which they have published modifying their H index. For this purpose we created six documents authored by a faked author and we uploaded them to a researcher s personal website under the University of Granadas domain. The result of the experiment meant an increase of 774 citations in 129 papers (six citations per paper) increasing the authors and journals H index. We analyse the malicious effect this type of practices can cause to Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics. Finally, we conclude with several deliberations over the effects these malpractices may have and the lack of control tools these tools offer

10 pages, 4 figures

Cited by in corpus (7)

• How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications
• The Google Scholar Experiment: how to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators
• H Index Communication Journals according to Google Scholar Metrics (2008-2012)
• H Index of scientific Nursing journals according to Google Scholar Metrics (2007-2011)
• Google Scholar Metrics 2013: nothing new under the sun
• Self-citation Analysis using Sentence Embeddings
• Implementing Recommendation Algorithms in a Large-Scale Biomedical Science Knowledge Base