Does the spacecraft trajectory strongly affect the detection of magnetic clouds?
arXiv:1211.5343 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220535
Abstract
Magnetic clouds (MCs) are a subset of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) where a magnetic flux rope is detected. Is the difference between MCs and ICMEs without detected flux rope intrinsic or rather due to an observational bias? As the spacecraft has no relationship with the MC trajectory, the frequency distribution of MCs versus the spacecraft distance to the MCs axis is expected to be approximately flat. However, Lepping and Wu (2010) confirmed that it is a strongly decreasing function of the estimated impact parameter. Is a flux rope more frequently undetected for larger impact parameter? In order to answer the questions above, we explore the parameter space of flux rope models, especially the aspect ratio, boundary shape, and current distribution. The proposed models are analyzed as MCs by fitting a circular linear force-free field to the magnetic field computed along simulated crossings. We find that the distribution of the twist within the flux rope, the non-detection due to too low field rotation angle or magnitude are only weakly affecting the expected frequency distribution of MCs versus impact parameter. However, the estimated impact parameter is increasingly biased to lower values as the flux-rope cross section is more elongated orthogonally to the crossing trajectory. The observed distribution of MCs is a natural consequence of a flux-rope cross section flattened in average by a factor 2 to 3 depending on the magnetic twist profile. However, the faster MCs at 1 AU, with V>550 km/s, present an almost uniform distribution of MCs vs. impact parameter, which is consistent with round shaped flux ropes, in contrast with the slower ones. We conclude that either most of the non-MC ICMEs are encountered outside their flux rope or near the leg region, or they do not contain any.
References in corpus (4)
- Progressive transformation of a flux rope to an ICME
- Linking two consecutive nonmerging magnetic clouds with their solar sources
- Numerical Modeling of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections and Comparison with Heliospheric Images
- Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of the Interaction between Interplanetary Strong Shock and Magnetic Cloud and its Consequent Geoeffectiveness
Cited by in corpus (18)
- The standard flare model in three dimensions III. Slip-running reconnection properties
- Formation of Magnetic Flux Ropes during Confined Flaring Well Before the Onset of a Pair of Major Coronal Mass Ejections
- Predicting the magnetic vectors within coronal mass ejections arriving at Earth: 1. Initial Architecture
- On the Spatial Coherence of Magnetic Ejecta: Measurements of Coronal Mass Ejections by Multiple Spacecraft Longitudinally Separated by 0.01 AU
- Investigating plasma motion of magnetic clouds at 1 AU through a velocity-modified cylindrical force-free flux rope model
- Global axis shape of magnetic clouds deduced from the distribution of their local axis orientation
- In Situ Properties of Small and Large Flux Ropes in the Solar Wind
- Magnetic Flux and Helicity of Magnetic Clouds
- Flux erosion of magnetic clouds by reconnection with the Sun's open flux
- Magnetic twist profile inside magnetic clouds derived with a superposed epoch analysis
- Eruption and propagation of twisted flux ropes from the base of the solar corona to 1 au
- First Taste of Hot Channel in Interplanetary Space
- Investigating The Cross-section of Coronal Mass Ejections Through the Study of Non-Radial Flows with STEREO/PLASTIC
- Quantitative model for the generic 3D shape of ICMEs at 1 AU
- Distorted-Toroidal Flux Rope model for Heliospheric Flux Ropes
- Using Coordinated Observations in Polarised White Light and Faraday Rotation to Probe the Spatial Position and Magnetic Field of an Interplanetary Sheath
- Re-analysis of Lepping's Fitting Method for Magnetic Clouds: Lundquist Fit Reloaded
- A robust estimation of the twist distribution in magnetic clouds