Anchoring Bias in Online Voting

Abstract

Voting online with explicit ratings could largely reflect people's preferences and objects' qualities, but ratings are always irrational, because they may be affected by many unpredictable factors like mood, weather, as well as other people's votes. By analyzing two real systems, this paper reveals a systematic bias embedding in the individual decision-making processes, namely people tend to give a low rating after a low rating, as well as a high rating following a high rating. This so-called \emph{anchoring bias} is validated via extensive comparisons with null models, and numerically speaking, the extent of bias decays with interval voting number in a logarithmic form. Our findings could be applied in the design of recommender systems and considered as important complementary materials to previous knowledge about anchoring effects on financial trades, performance judgements, auctions, and so on.

5 pages, 4 tables, 5 figures

References in corpus (5)

• Power-law distributions in empirical data
• Understanding individual human mobility patterns
• The scaling laws of human travel
• Recommender Systems
• Role of Activity in Human Dynamics

Cited by in corpus (7)

• Evaluating user reputation in online rating systems via an iterative group-based ranking method
• Information Filtering via Collaborative User Clustering Modeling
• Promoting cold-start items in recommender systems
• Strong ties promote the epidemic prevalence in susceptible-infected-susceptible spreading dynamics
• Improving the performance of reputation evaluating by combining the structure of network and nonlinear recovery
• Consistence beats causality in recommender systems
• Memory effect of the online user preference