An alternative perspective on projectivity of modules

Abstract

Similar to the idea of relative projectivity, we introduce the notion of relative subprojectivity, which is an alternative way to measure the projectivity of a module. Given modules $M$ and $N$, $M$ is said to be {\em $N$-subprojective} if for every epimorphism $g:B\to N$ and homomorphism $f:M\to N$, then there exists a homomorphism $h:M\to B$ such that $gh=f$. For a module $M$, the {\em subprojectivity domain of $M$} is defined to be the collection of all modules $N$ such that $M$ is $N$-subprojective. A module is projective if and only if its subprojectivity domain consists of all modules. Opposite to this idea, a module $M$ is said to be {\em subprojectively poor}, or {\em $sp$-poor} if its subprojectivity domain is as small as conceivably possible, that is, consisting of exactly the projective modules. Properties of subprojectivity domains and $sp$-poor modules are studied. In particular, the existence of an $sp$-poor module is attained for artinian serial rings.

Dedicated to the memory of Francisco Raggi; v2 some editorial changes. 'Right hereditary right perfect' replaced by the (equivalent) condition 'right hereditary semiprimary'; v3 a mistake corrected in the statements of Propositions 3.8 and 3.9

References in corpus (1)

• Characterizing rings in terms of the extent of injectivity and projectivity of their modules

Cited by in corpus (1)

• max-projective modules