Extending BEAMS to incorporate correlated systematic uncertainties
arXiv:1205.3493 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/01/039
Abstract
New supernova surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey, Pan-STARRS and the LSST will produce an unprecedented number of photometric supernova candidates, most with no spectroscopic data. Avoiding biases in cosmological parameters due to the resulting inevitable contamination from non-Ia supernovae can be achieved with the BEAMS formalism, allowing for fully photometric supernova cosmology studies. Here we extend BEAMS to deal with the case in which the supernovae are correlated by systematic uncertainties. The analytical form of the full BEAMS posterior requires evaluating 2^N terms, where N is the number of supernova candidates. This `exponential catastrophe' is computationally unfeasible even for N of order 100. We circumvent the exponential catastrophe by marginalising numerically instead of analytically over the possible supernova types: we augment the cosmological parameters with nuisance parameters describing the covariance matrix and the types of all the supernovae, τ_i, that we include in our MCMC analysis. We show that this method deals well even with large, unknown systematic uncertainties without a major increase in computational time, whereas ignoring the correlations can lead to significant biases and incorrect credible contours. We then compare the numerical marginalisation technique with a perturbative expansion of the posterior based on the insight that future surveys will have exquisite light curves and hence the probability that a given candidate is a Type Ia will be close to unity or zero, for most objects. Although this perturbative approach changes computation of the posterior from a 2^N problem into an N^2 or N^3 one, we show that it leads to biases in general through a small number of misclassifications, implying that numerical marginalisation is superior.
Resubmitted under married name Lochner (formally Knights). Version 3: major changes, including a large scale analysis with thousands of MCMC chains. Matches version published in JCAP. 23 pages, 8 figures
References in corpus (23)
- Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
- Three Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Polarization Analysis
- Spectra and Light Curves of Six Type Ia Supernovae at 0.511 < z < 1.12 and the Union2 Compilation
- Supernova Constraints and Systematic Uncertainties from the First 3 Years of the Supernova Legacy Survey
- Improved Distances to Type Ia Supernovae with Multicolor Light Curve Shapes: MLCS2k2
- The Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II Supernova Survey: Technical Summary
- The Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II Supernova Survey: Search Algorithm and Follow-up Observations
- Supernova Simulations and Strategies For the Dark Energy Survey
- Photometric SN Ia Candidates from the Three-Year SDSS-II SN Survey Data
- Improved Constraints on Type Ia Supernova Host Galaxy Properties using Multi-Wavelength Photometry and their Correlations with Supernova Properties
- Cosmology with Photometrically-Classified Type Ia Supernovae from the SDSS-II Supernova Survey
- Spectroscopic Properties of Star-Forming Host Galaxies and Type Ia Supernova Hubble Residuals in a Nearly Unbiased Sample
- Bayesian Estimation Applied to Multiple Species: Towards cosmology with a million supernovae
- The Impact of Cosmic Dust on Supernova Cosmology
- Photometric Supernova Cosmology with BEAMS and SDSS-II
- The Hubble Space Telescope Cluster Supernova Survey: III. Correlated Properties of Type Ia Supernovae and Their Hosts at 0.9 < z < 1.46
- Large-scale inhomogeneities may improve the cosmic concordance of supernovae
- Parameter Estimation with BEAMS in the presence of biases and correlations
- Cosmic Dust Induced Flux Fluctuations: Bad and Good Aspects
- Correlated Supernova Systematics and Ground Based Surveys
- Type Ia Supernovae Selection and Forecast of Cosmology Constraints for the Dark Energy Survey
- Dark Energy Survey Supernovae: Simulations and Survey Strategy
- The Self-Calibrating Hubble Diagram
Cited by in corpus (12)
- Photometric Supernova Classification With Machine Learning
- Measuring Dark Energy Properties with Photometrically Classified Pan-STARRS Supernovae. II. Cosmological Parameters
- The Foundation Supernova Survey: Measuring Cosmological Parameters with Supernovae from a Single Telescope
- BAHAMAS: new SNIa analysis reveals inconsistencies with standard cosmology
- Machine Learning Classification of SDSS Transient Survey Images
- STACCATO: A Novel Solution to Supernova Photometric Classification with Biased Training Sets
- Binning is Sinning (Supernova Version): The Impact of Self-Calibration in Cosmological Analyses with Type Ia Supernovae
- zBEAMS: A unified solution for supernova cosmology with redshift uncertainties
- Assessment of the Systematic Uncertainties in the Cosmological Analysis of the SDSS Supernovae Photometric Sample
- Bayesian Anomaly Detection and Classification
- Impact of Rubin Observatory cadence choices on supernovae photometric classification
- Considerations for optimizing photometric classification of supernovae from the Rubin Observatory