Multi-Prover Quantum Merlin-Arthur Proof Systems with Small Gap
arXiv:1205.2761
Abstract
This paper studies multiple-proof quantum Merlin-Arthur (QMA) proof systems in the setting when the completeness-soundness gap is small. Small means that we only lower-bound the gap with an inverse-exponential function of the input length, or with an even smaller function. Using the protocol of Blier and Tapp [arXiv:0709.0738], we show that in this case the proof system has the same expressive power as non-deterministic exponential time (NEXP). Since single-proof QMA proof systems, with the same bound on the gap, have expressive power at most exponential time (EXP), we get a separation between single and multi-prover proof systems in the 'small-gap setting', under the assumption that EXP is not equal to NEXP. This implies, among others, the nonexistence of certain operators called disentanglers (defined by Aaronson et al. [arXiv:0804.0802]), with good approximation parameters. We also show that in this setting the proof system has the same expressive power if we restrict the verifier to be able to perform only Bell-measurements, i.e., using a BellQMA verifier. This is not known to hold in the usual setting, when the gap is bounded by an inverse-polynomial function of the input length. To show this we use the protocol of Chen and Drucker [arXiv:1011.0716]. The only caveat here is that we need at least a linear amount of proofs to achieve the power of NEXP, while in the previous setting two proofs were enough. We also study the case when the proof-lengths are only logarithmic in the input length and observe that in some cases the expressive power decreases. However, we show that it doesn't decrease further if we make the proof lengths to be even shorter.
23 pages
References in corpus (11)
- Universal Quantum Computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas
- Quantum fingerprinting
- N-representability is QMA-complete
- Quantum Randomness and Nondeterminism
- Entanglement Theory and the Quantum Simulation of Many-Body Physics
- Short Multi-Prover Quantum Proofs for SAT without Entangled Measurements
- Stabilisation of Quantum Computations by Symmetrisation
- Improved Soundness for QMA with Multiple Provers
- A quantum characterization of NP
- Quantum interactive proofs with weak error bounds
- On quantum interactive proofs with short messages
Cited by in corpus (8)
- An improved semidefinite programming hierarchy for testing entanglement
- Importance of the spectral gap in estimating ground-state energies
- Improved Soundness for QMA with Multiple Provers
- Limitations of semidefinite programs for separable states and entangled games
- Quantum generalizations of the polynomial hierarchy with applications to QMA(2)
- One-Sided Error QMA with Shared EPR Pairs -- A Simpler Proof
- An exponential time upper bound for Quantum Merlin-Arthur games with unentangled provers
- QMA(2) with postselection equals to NEXP