Solving the Odd Perfect Number Problem: Some Old and New Approaches
arXiv:1204.1450
Abstract
A perfect number is a positive integer such that the sum of all the positive divisors of equals , denoted by . The question of the existence of odd perfect numbers (OPNs) is one of the longest unsolved problems of number theory. This thesis presents some of the old as well as new approaches to solving the OPN Problem. In particular, a conjecture predicting an injective and surjective mapping between OPNs (with Euler factor ) and rational points on the hyperbolic arc with and , is disproved. Various results on the abundancy index and solitary numbers are used in the disproof. Numerical evidence against the said conjecture will likewise be discussed. We will show that if an OPN has the form above, then follows from \cite{D10}. We will also attempt to prove a conjectured improvement of this last result to by observing that and in all cases. Lastly, we also prove the following generalization: If is the canonical factorization of an OPN , then for all . This gives rise to the inequality which is true for all , where is the number of distinct prime factors of .
arXiv comment134 pages
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (11)
- On a Curious Biconditional Involving Divisors of Odd Perfect Numbers
- Conditions Equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli Conjecture on Odd Perfect Numbers
- A Partial Proof of a Conjecture of Dris
- Euclid-Euler Heuristics for Perfect Numbers
- New Results for the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli Conjecture on Odd Perfect Numbers
- Solving the Odd Perfect Number Problem: Some New Approaches
- A Sufficient Condition for Disproving Descartes's Conjecture on Odd Perfect Numbers
- The Non-Euler Part of a Spoof Odd Perfect Number is Not Almost Perfect
- On the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli and Dris Conjectures Regarding Odd Perfect Numbers
- On the quantity where is an odd perfect number -- Part II
- A short proof for the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture on odd perfect numbers