Is there any coherent measure for eternal inflation?
arXiv:1202.3376 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.063509
Abstract
An eternally inflating universe produces an infinite amount of spatial volume, so every possible event happens an infinite number of times, and it is impossible to define probabilities in terms of frequencies. This problem is usually addressed by means of a measure, which regulates the infinities and produces meaningful predictions. I argue that any measure should obey certain general axioms, but then give a simple toy model in which one can prove that no measure obeying the axioms exists. In certain cases of eternal inflation there are measures that obey the axioms, but all such measures appear to be unacceptable for other reasons. Thus the problem of defining sensible probabilities in eternal inflation seems not be solved.
10 pages, no figures, RevTeX. Ver. 2: simplification: only two axioms and two "colors" of observer
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (12)
- Asymptotic Observables and the Swampland
- Watchers of the multiverse
- Probing Two-Field Open Inflation by Resonant Signals in Correlation Functions
- A Smooth Landscape: Ending Saddle Point Inflation Requires Features to be Shallow
- Particle Production during Inflation in Light of PLANCK
- Global structure of the multiverse and the measure problem
- Dynamical systems of eternal inflation: A possible solution to the problems of entropy, measure, observables and initial conditions
- Black holes and up-tunneling suppress Boltzmann brains
- The Continuum of Discrete Trajectories in Eternal Inflation
- Black hole production, eternal inflation, and information in quasi-de Sitter space
- Mimetic Inflation and Self-reproduction
- Cosmic Logic: a Computational Model