Reply to [arXiv:1201.5347] "Comment on 'Vortex-assisted photon counts and their magnetic field dependence in single-photon superconducting detectors'"
arXiv:1202.1276 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.026502
Abstract
We argue that cutoff in the London model cannot be settled without use of the microscopic theory.
References in corpus (4)
- Vortex-induced dissipation in narrow current-biased thin-film superconducting strips
- Vortex-assisted photon counts and their magnetic field dependence in single-photon detectors
- Size effects in the nonlinear resistance and flux creep in a virtual Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless state of superconducting films
- Comment on: "Vortex-assisted photon count and their magnetic field dependence in single-photon superconducting detectors" by L.N. Bulaevskii, M.J. Graf and V.G. Kogan, Phys. Rev. B 85, 014505 (2012)
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Laser modulation of superconductivity in a cryogenic widefield nitrogen-vacancy microscope
- Numerical analysis of detection-mechanism models of SNSPD
- Effect of the wire width on the intrinsic detection efficiency of superconducting-nanowire single-photon detectors
- Magnetic-field dependence of count rates in superconducting thin-film TaN single-photon detectors