Quantum Counterfactuals and Locality
arXiv:1201.0255 · doi:10.1007/s10701-012-9637-9
Abstract
Stapp's counterfactual argument for quantum nonlocality based upon a Hardy entangled state is shown to be flawed. While he has correctly analyzed a particular framework using the method of consistent histories, there are alternative frameworks which do not support his argument. The framework dependence of quantum counterfactual arguments, with analogs in classical counterfactuals, vitiates the claim that nonlocal (superluminal) influences exist in the quantum world. Instead it shows that counterfactual arguments are of limited use for analyzing these questions.
8 pages, 1 PSTricks figure
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Particle Path Through a Nested Mach-Zehnder Interferometer
- Nonlocality Claims are Inconsistent with Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics
- Quantum Measurements and Contextuality
- Bell inequalities, Counterfactual Definiteness and Falsifiability
- Quantum Locality?
- Consistent Quantum Measurements
- Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics Is Noncontextual
- Quantum mechanics is compatible with counterfactual definiteness