Sample-to-sample fluctuations in real-network ensembles

Abstract

Network modeling based on ensemble averages tacitly assumes that the networks meant to be modeled are typical in the ensemble. Previous research on network eigenvalues, which govern a range of dynamical phenomena, has shown that this is indeed the case for uncorrelated networks with minimum degree $\ge 3$. Here we focus on real networks, which generally have both structural correlations and low-degree nodes. We show that: (i) the ensemble distribution of the dynamically most important eigenvalues can be not only broad and far apart from the real eigenvalue but also highly structured, often with a multimodal rather than bell-shaped form; (ii) these interesting properties are found to be due to low-degree nodes, mainly those with degree $<3$, and network communities, which is a common form of structural correlation found in real networks. In addition to having implications for ensemble-based approaches, this shows that low-degree nodes may have a stronger influence on collective dynamics than previously anticipated from the study of computer-generated networks.

References in corpus (9)

• Modularity and community structure in networks
• Synchronization in complex networks
• Critical phenomena in complex networks
• Network Synchronization, Diffusion, and the Paradox of Heterogeneity
• Enhancing complex-network synchronization
• The entropy of network ensembles
• Random graphs containing arbitrary distributions of subgraphs
• Approximating the largest eigenvalue of network adjacency matrices
• Laplacian spectra of complex networks and random walks on them: Are scale-free architectures really important?

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Synchronization of interconnected networks: the role of connector nodes
• Erosion of synchronization: Coupling heterogeneity and network structure
• A network-specific approach to percolation in networks with bidirectional links
• Network Extreme Eigenvalue - from Multimodal to Scale-free Network
• Large algebraic connectivity fluctuations in spatial network ensembles imply a predictive advantage from node location information