Reply to comment on "Lost in translation: topological singularities in group field theory"

Abstract

In [1, arXiv:1102.1844] the author disputes the conclusion of our paper [2, arXiv:1006.0714]. He claims that the Feynman graphs of three dimensional group field theory always represent pseudo manifolds. However, [1] uses a different definition for pseudo manifolds. also, in order to apply the new definition, [1] proposes a construction which cannot be implemented in a path integral by Feynman rules. These two points invalidate the claims of [1].

References in corpus (2)

• Lost in Translation: Topological Singularities in Group Field Theory
• Comment on `Lost in Translation: Topological Singularities in Group Field Theory'

Cited by in corpus (4)

• The Tensor Track, III
• Large $N$ Limits in Tensor Models: Towards More Universality Classes of Colored Triangulations in Dimension $d\ge 2$
• Laplacians on discrete and quantum geometries
• Blobbed topological recursion for the quartic melonic tensor model