If physics is an information science, what is an observer?

Abstract

Interpretations of quantum theory have traditionally assumed a "Galilean" observer, a bare "point of view" implemented physically by a quantum system. This paper investigates the consequences of replacing such an informationally-impoverished observer with an observer that satisfies the requirements of classical automata theory, i.e. an observer that encodes sufficient prior information to identify the system being observed and recognize its acceptable states. It shows that with reasonable assumptions about the physical dynamics of information channels, the observations recorded by such an observer will display the typical characteristics predicted by quantum theory, without requiring any specific assumptions about the observer's physical implementation.

30 pages, comments welcome; v2 significant revisions - results unchanged

Cited by in corpus (7)

• A model-theoretic interpretation of environmentally-induced superselection
• Some Consequences of the Thermodynamic Cost of System Identification
• Building the Observer into the System: Toward a Realistic Description of Human Interaction with the World
• On the Ollivier-Poulin-Zurek definition of objectivity
• Implementation of classical communication in a quantum world
• Bell's Theorem from Moore's Theorem
• Consistent quantum mechanics admits no mereotopology