A critical analysis of three near-infrared photometric methods of estimating distances to cataclysmic variables

Abstract

A critical analysis of three methods of estimating distances to cataclysmic variables (CVs) is performed. These methods, by Ak et al., Beuermann, and Knigge, all use near-infrared (JHK or Ks) magnitudes and the Barnes-Evans relation. We compare all three methods to distances measured by trigonometric parallax by Thorstensen, with Hubble Space Telescope, and with the HIPPARCOS spacecraft. We find that the method of Ak et al. works best overall for all CVs, predicting distances on the average 4% less than those measured by trigonometric parallaxes. The method of Beuermann overestimates distances by 52%. The method of Knigge underestimates distances by 26%, although this was only ever meant as a lower limit, since it assumes all light comes from the secondary star.

17 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables; accepted for publication in New Astronomy

References in corpus (5)

• The Evolution of Cataclysmic Variables as Revealed by their Donor Stars
• The Donor Stars of Cataclysmic Variables
• Barnes-Evans relations for dwarfs with an application to the determination of distances to cataclysmic variables
• Parallax and Distance Estimates for Twelve Cataclysmic Variable Stars
• A new absolute magnitude calibration with 2MASS for cataclysmic variables

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Testing the disk instability model of cataclysmic variables
• Quasi-periodic oscillations in accreting magnetic white dwarfs I. Observational constraints in X-ray and optical
• Galactic model parameters of cataclysmic variables: Results from a new absolute magnitude calibration with 2MASS and WISE
• Population types of cataclysmic variables in the solar neighbourhood
• Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of Three Long Period Nova-Like Variables