Haunted quantum contextuality versus value indefiniteness - a minority report
arXiv:1107.4359 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27654-5_23
Abstract
Physical entities are ultimately (re)constructed from elementary yes/no events, in particular clicks in detectors or measurement devices recording quanta. Recently, the interpretation of certain such clicks has given rise to unfounded claims which are neither necessary nor sufficient, although they are presented in that way. In particular, clicks can neither inductively support nor "(dis)prove" the Kochen-Specker theorem, which is a formal result that has a deductive proof by contradiction. More importantly, the alleged empirical evidence of quantum contextuality, which is "inferred" from violations of bounds of classical probabilities by quantum correlations, is based on highly nontrivial assumptions, in particular on physical omniscience.
2 pages
References in corpus (9)
- Experimentally testable state-independent quantum contextuality
- State-independent experimental test of quantum contextuality
- Experimental non-classicality of an indivisible quantum system
- Experimental test of quantum contextuality in neutron interferometry
- State-independent quantum contextuality with single photons
- Quantum randomness and value indefiniteness
- Proposal for revealing quantum nonlocality via local contextuality
- Proposal of a two-qutrit contextuality test free of the finite precision and compatibility loopholes
- Are simultaneous Bell measurements possible?