Electromagnetic inertia, reactive energy, and energy flow velocity
arXiv:1105.4834 · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/34/345206
Abstract
In a recent paper titled "Coherent electromagnetic wavelets and their twisting null congruences," I defined the local inertia density (I), reactive energy density (R), and energy flow velocity (v) of an electromagnetic field. These are the field equivalents of the mass, rest energy, and velocity of a relativistic particle. Thus R and I are Lorentz-invariant and |v|<=c, with equality if and only if R=0. The exceptional fields with |v|=c were called "coherent" because their energy moves in complete harmony with the field, leaving no inertia or reactive energy behind. Generic electromagnetic fields become coherent only in the far zone. Elsewhere, their energy flows at speeds |v|<c. The purpose of this paper is to confirm and clarify this statement by studying the local energy flow in several common systems: a time-harmonic electric dipole field, a time-dependent electric dipole field, and a standing plane wave. For these fields, the energy current (Poynting vector) is too weak to carry away all of the energy, thus leaving reactive energy in its wake. For the time-dependent dipole field, we find that the energy can flow both transversally and inwards, back to the source. Neither of these phenomena show up in the usual computation of the energy transport velocity which considers only averages over one period in the time-harmonic case.
20 pages, 7 figures
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Stored Electromagnetic Energy and Quality Factor of Radiating Structures
- Reexamination of energy flow velocities of non-diffracting localized waves
- Reactive energy in non-diffracting localized waves
- The Reactive Energy of Transient EM Fields
- Various Interpretations of the Stored and the Radiated Energy Density
- On the Superposition and Elastic Recoil of Electromagnetic Waves
- Completing the complex Poynting theorem: Conservation of reactive energy in reactive time
- Electromagnetic helicity wavelets: a model for quasar engines?
- From Poynting vector to new degree of freedom of polarization