Can smooth LTB models mimicking the cosmological constant for the luminosity distance also satisfy the age constraint?

Abstract

The central smoothness of the functions defining a LTB solution plays a crucial role in their ability to mimick the effects of the cosmological constant. So far attention has been focused on $C^1$ models while in this paper we approach it a more general way, investigating the implications of higher order central smoothness conditions for LTB models reproducing the luminosity distance of a $\Lambda CDM$ Universe. Our analysis is based on a low red-shift expansion, and extends previous investigations by including also the constraint coming from the age of the Universe and re-expressing the equations for the solution of the inversion problem in a manifestly dimensionless form which makes evident the freedom to accommodate any value of $H_0$ as well, correcting some wrong claims that the observed value of $H_0$ would be enough to rule out LTB models. Higher order smoothness conditions strongly limit the number of possible solutions respect to the first order condition. Neither a $C^1$ or a $C^i$ LTB model can both satisfy the age constraint and mimick the cosmological constant for the luminosity distance. One difference is in the case in which the age constraint is not included and the bang function is zero, in which there is a unique solution for $C^1$ models but no solution for the $C^i$ case. Another difference is in the case in which the age constraint is not included and the bang function is not zero, in which the solution is undetermined for both $C^1$ and $C^i$ models, but the latter ones have much less residual parametric freedom. Our results imply that any LTB model able to fit luminosity distance data and satisfy the age constraint is either not mimicking exactly the $\Lambda CDM$ red-shift space observables theoretical predictions or it is not $C^{\infty }$ smooth.

21 pages, 5 tables, new sections added

References in corpus (15)

• Time drift of cosmological redshifts as a test of the Copernican principle
• Dynamical Dark Energy or Simply Cosmic Curvature?
• Living in a Void: Testing the Copernican Principle with Distant Supernovae
• Mimicking Dark Energy with Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi Models: Weak Central Singularities and Critical Points
• Can we avoid dark energy?
• Precision cosmology defeats void models for acceleration
• The supernova Hubble diagram for off-center observers in a spherically symmetric inhomogeneous universe
• Mapping Luminosity-Redshift Relationship to LTB Cosmology
• The kSZ effect as a test of general radial inhomogeneity in LTB cosmology
• Can inhomogeneties accelerate the cosmic volume expansion?
• Can decaying modes save void models for acceleration?
• LTB universes as alternatives to dark energy: does positive averaged acceleration imply positive cosmic acceleration?
• Redshift spherical shell energy in isotropic Universes
• Conditions for low-redshift positive apparent acceleration in smooth inhomogeneous models
• Apparent versus true value of the cosmological constant

Cited by in corpus (1)

• Some clarifications about Lemaître-Tolman models of the Universe used to deal with the dark energy problem